Connect with us

Latest News

‘Desperate situation’ for Ghani as his power is undermined: NYT

Published

on

A senior Afghan military official said this week that if the US pulls out without a political settlement having been reached between government and the Taliban, the country will be in “deep trouble”.

Speaking to the New York Times this week, the security official said: “If the US pulls out, and there is no political agreement, then we are in deep trouble.”

“Militarily, we don’t have much hope,” he said. “If we don’t get something, the Taliban are going to march. It’s going to be a severe battle.”

One Western diplomat in Kabul said the country’s military position is deteriorating. Each day brings news of security force members blown up or gunned down.

“They can’t keep doing that,” said the diplomat, commenting on the steady loss of military strength. “The toll on the government, and the credibility and legitimacy it has, it’s not sustainable.”

The New York Times reported that this comes at a time where President Ashraf Ghani has few remaining allies, the Taliban are gaining militarily and his international supporters are impatient with him and the stumbling peace process.

The article questions how much control Ghani actually has over his country’s future and his own – questions that have, according to the NYT, been largely resolved by politicians, analysts and citizen: Not much!

NYT reports Ghani is dependent on the counsel of a handful of people and is unwilling to even watch television news – also that he is losing allies fast.

This, the NYT reports, spells trouble for a country where a hard-line insurgency has the upper hand militarily, where nearly half the population faces hunger at crisis levels, where the majority of government money comes from donors and where weak governance and widespread corruption are endemic.

This, meanwhile, is all taking place as Washington is preparing to pull out its last remaining troops, “a prospect expected to lead to the medium-term collapse of the Afghan forces they now support,” the report read.

Former National Directorate of Security chief Rahmatullah Nabil told the NYT: “He (Ghani) is in a desperate situation.”

“We’re getting weaker. Security is weak, everything is getting weaker, and the Taliban are taking advantage.”

The NYT reported that many are fed up with what they see as Ghani’s obstinacy in refusing to make concessions to adversaries, or his condescending style and that a recent letter to him from US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was so harsh that even Afghans critical of Ghani found it insulting.

The letter used the phrase “I urge you” three times while Blinken also said “I must also make clear to you, Mr. President … that as our policy process continues in Washington, the United States has not ruled out any option.”

The NYT stated that the unspoken subtext was clear: Your influence is minimal.

Hekmat Khalil Karzai, the head of an Afghan think tank reacted to this and said: “As an Afghan, a sense of humiliation comes over you.”

“But I also feel Ghani deserves it,” Karzai said. “He’s dealing with the kiss of death from his own closest partner.”

This comes as US President Joe Biden continues to “review” the agreement signed with the Taliban in February last year – which stipulates Washington pulls out all its troops by May 1 – a deadline that is just three weeks away.

It also comes amid a flurry of meetings between leaders of countries in the region, of US officials and Afghan politicians.

The key issue currently is the US proposal of an interim government followed by elections – an interim government that would include Taliban participation.

As pointed out by the NYT, such a move could require Ghani to step down – something he has until now repeatedly refused to consider.

Ghani has his own plan, which includes early elections but the NYT states, both Washington’s plan and Ghani’s could fall flat as the Taliban have never said they would agree to elections, nor have they indicated that they would go along with any sort of government plan or be content with power-sharing.

“From what we’re seeing, they want absolute power, and they are waiting to take power by force,” Ghani’s national security adviser, Hamdullah Mohib, said in an interview.

Visions of September 1996, when the Taliban rolled into Kabul virtually unopposed and proceeded to establish their harsh regime, haunt the capital, the NYT stated.

Meanwhile some former officials criticized Ghani as being compelled to micromanage all ministries and departments, including that of military matters.

Karzai said: “He likes that, because he feels he’s the only one [competent to make serious decisions].”

But Mohib called the micromanagement accusation “a huge exaggeration,” saying that the president had not attended a security meeting “in weeks,” adding that “he is aware of the strategic picture.”

When contacted by the NYT for an interview, Ghani’s communications office refused, while a senior aide did not respond to an interview request.

A Western diplomat meanwhile told the NYT that the consequences of Ghani’s isolation is not good for Afghan unity and that these divisions spread from Kabul into the country’s fractious regions, where independent militias and other longstanding power-brokers have either rearmed themselves or are preparing to do so.

One example cited by the NYT is the low-intensity fight between government forces and the militia of a minority militia commander, Alipour, which has been smoldering for months.

The fight was recently fueled by the downing of an Afghan forces helicopter in March by Alipour’s men.

The NYT reported that Ghani and his aides have taken an active role in managing the conflict, to the dismay of the Afghan military.
“This is what we wanted to avoid. We are already stretched,” said a senior Afghan security official. “And here, you want to start another war?”

In conclusion, the NYT article noted that the upcoming talks in Turkey, the Istanbul Summit, could well end up like the recent ones in Moscow and Dushanbe, Tajikistan — with bland communiqués deploring violence and hoping for peace.

The American idea — to substitute new talks in a new locale for the old talks in Qatar that have gone nowhere — is not necessarily a winning bet and that early signs are not promising, with Ghani once again rejecting preliminary American proposals, and the Taliban aggressively noncommittal about the ideas currently on the table, the NYT reported.

Latest News

Unexploded ordnance contaminates 901 square kms of land in Afghanistan

Published

on

Around 901 square kilometres of land across Afghanistan is contaminated with unexploded ordnance, posing a continuing threat to civilians, particularly children, Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority said.

Mohammad Yousuf Hammad, spokesperson for the Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority, made the remarks in an interview with Afghanistan’s state-controlled national broadcaster.

Hammad said explosions involving landmines and unexploded remnants of war continue to kill and injure large numbers of Afghans every year.

He added that, with financial support from the United Nations Special Trust Fund for Afghanistan, more than 73,000 square metres of contaminated land had been cleared in Kunduz and Baghlan provinces by December 2025.

According to available figures, approximately 1,026 people were killed or injured in Afghanistan in landmine and unexploded ordnance explosions in 2021.

Decades of conflict have left large quantities of explosive remnants of war scattered across the country, creating persistent dangers for civilians.

Children remain particularly vulnerable, as unexploded devices can be mistaken for ordinary objects or encountered while playing and travelling through affected areas.

The reported contamination highlights the continuing need for mine-clearance operations, humanitarian assistance and public awareness programmes to protect communities and prevent further civilian casualties.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Afghanistan and Uzbekistan sign trade deals worth more than $151 million

Meanwhile, Yarqin Malikov, Chairman of the Uzbekistan Exporters Association, said trade relations between the two countries had expanded significantly.

Published

on

Private sector representatives from Afghanistan and Uzbekistan have signed dozens of trade agreements worth a combined $151.16 million during a business meeting in Kabul, as both countries seek to expand economic cooperation and strengthen bilateral trade ties.

The agreements were signed by representatives of around 80 companies from both countries across various economic and commercial sectors.

Speaking at the meeting, Mojib Rahman Shirzad, Deputy Head of the Afghanistan Chamber of Commerce and Investment, described expanding trade and economic relations between Kabul and Tashkent as important for both countries.

He said increased exchanges of government and private-sector delegations in recent months had created opportunities for direct engagement between business communities, helping pave the way for stronger commercial cooperation.

Meanwhile, Yarqin Malikov, Chairman of the Uzbekistan Exporters Association, said trade relations between the two countries had expanded significantly.

According to Malikov, bilateral trade, which previously stood at around $80 million, has now exceeded $1.8 billion.

He attributed the growth to stronger relations between the two countries and increasing mutual trust among Afghan and Uzbek business communities.

Malikov also said Uzbek investors and business representatives were exploring Afghanistan’s commercial potential and considering opportunities to establish joint ventures in the country.

He noted that trade figures during 2024 and 2025, particularly the first seven months of 2026, demonstrated significant growth in economic relations between the neighbouring countries.

The signing of the agreements comes as an Afghan delegation, led by the Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Livestock, travelled to Uzbekistan on Saturday.

The delegation is expected to meet Uzbek officials to discuss expanding bilateral cooperation in several sectors, particularly agriculture.

The latest business agreements are expected to create further opportunities for private-sector cooperation, investment and increased trade between Afghanistan and Uzbekistan.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Afghanistan needs strong, modern and independent army, says defence chief

He said those who returned could live in the country with dignity but warned that anyone continuing armed activities would face the country’s security forces.

Published

on

Afghanistan needs a strong, professionally trained and well-equipped army to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity, the country’s Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, Fasihuddin Fitrat, has said.

Fitrat said the armed forces were prepared to defend Afghanistan against internal and external threats, stressing that military strength was essential to preserving the country’s independence.

He said Afghanistan’s independence had been achieved through years of struggle and sacrifice by the Mujahideen, adding that maintaining it required a modern military equipped with advanced weapons and properly trained personnel.

According to Fitrat, strengthening the military was not about threatening neighbouring countries or pursuing territorial expansion, but about protecting Afghanistan from aggression, pressure and foreign interference.

He said a capable armed force would also help the Islamic Emirate maintain security and provide an environment in which Afghans could live in peace.

Military independence a priority

Fitrat emphasised the need to build an independent and professional military, criticising the former Afghan National Defence and Security Forces for their reliance on foreign support.

He argued that the previous military lacked the ability to operate independently and blamed former government officials for its collapse following the withdrawal of international forces.

He said military and economic independence remained central priorities for the Islamic Emirate, adding that while Afghanistan wanted friendly relations with other countries, it would not accept foreign control over its economy or natural resources.

Fitrat criticises Pakistan’s border restrictions

Turning to tensions with Pakistan, Fitrat criticised Islamabad over restrictions at border crossings, accusing it of closing routes during Afghanistan’s export season while reopening them when imports were required.

He said the Islamic Emirate had responded to the restrictions and insisted that Afghanistan would not remain dependent on other countries for its defence requirements.

Fitrat also claimed that Afghanistan had experienced five years of peace and security and made progress in several sectors, alleging that some countries were unwilling to accept these developments.

Warning to armed opposition groups

Fitrat issued a warning to armed opposition groups, urging individuals he accused of operating under foreign direction to return to Afghanistan and surrender to the judicial authorities.

He said those who returned could live in the country with dignity but warned that anyone continuing armed activities would face the country’s security forces.

He stressed that no individual or group would be allowed to threaten public safety or disrupt the lives of ordinary Afghans.

Denies opposition presence in Badakhshan

Addressing reports of opposition fighters operating in Badakhshan, Fitrat dismissed claims and footage allegedly showing fighters in the province’s mountainous areas.

He claimed that some footage circulating as evidence of opposition activity in Badakhshan had actually been filmed in Pakistan’s Chitral region.

Fitrat insisted that no opposition fighters were present in the mountains of Badakhshan, adding that Afghanistan’s security and intelligence forces were active throughout the country.

He also dismissed opposition groups as largely symbolic organisations, claiming their members were based in Pakistan and operating under foreign influence.

Fitrat concluded by assuring the public that the armed forces would continue working to prevent security threats and protect the country’s population.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Ariana News. All rights reserved!