Latest News
Trump criticised over claim NATO allies avoided Afghanistan frontlines
Sky News US correspondent David Blevins said the remarks would be viewed as “grossly offensive” by allied nations whose troops fought and died alongside American forces.
US President Donald Trump has drawn sharp criticism from allies after claiming NATO forces remained “off the frontlines” during the war in Afghanistan, remarks widely described as inaccurate and offensive by politicians and military veterans.
Speaking in an interview with Fox News on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump repeated long-standing criticisms of the NATO alliance, saying he was not “sure” it would support the United States in a future conflict.
“We’ve never needed them,” Trump said. “They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan — and they did — they stayed a little back, a little off the frontlines.”
The comments prompted swift backlash from NATO partners who fought alongside US forces following the September 11, 2001 attacks — the only time NATO has invoked Article 5, its collective defence clause.
Following 9/11, NATO allies joined the US-led invasion of Afghanistan, a conflict that lasted two decades and resulted in heavy casualties among coalition forces. The United States lost 2,461 service members, while allied nations suffered 1,160 fatalities. The United Kingdom recorded the second-highest death toll, with 457 military personnel killed.
Sky News US correspondent David Blevins said the remarks would be viewed as “grossly offensive” by allied nations whose troops fought and died alongside American forces.
UK Social Care Minister Stephen Kinnock said Trump’s comments were “deeply disappointing” and lacked any factual basis.
“There is a long history of the British armed forces standing shoulder to shoulder with the United States,” Kinnock told Sky News. “The only time NATO’s Article 5 has ever been activated was to come to America’s aid after 9/11.”
He added that British and allied soldiers “gave their lives in support of American-led missions” and said any criticism of their sacrifice was “plainly wrong.”
Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the UK Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Select Committee, also condemned the remarks, calling them “an insult” to the families of fallen soldiers.
“How dare he say we weren’t on the frontline,” she said during a BBC broadcast. “We have always been there whenever the Americans have asked.”
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey echoed the criticism, accusing Trump of questioning the sacrifices of allied troops while having avoided military service himself during the Vietnam War.
Former British Army officer and Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty, who served in Afghanistan, said Trump’s comments diminished the sacrifices made by NATO soldiers.
“I saw first-hand the horrific casualties suffered by British troops in Sangin, alongside US Marines,” he said. “These remarks do a disservice to our closest military allies.”
The controversy has reignited debate over Trump’s scepticism toward NATO, an alliance the United States helped found and has long described as central to Western collective security.
Latest News
Afghanistan signs AFN 1 billion water supply deal to benefit 50,000 Kabul families
The initiative aims to strengthen water supply infrastructure in the 17th district and improve residents’ access to drinking water.
Afghanistan’s state-owned Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Corporation has signed a AFN 1 billion contract with private company Paktia Mawoj to develop a water supply project expected to benefit around 50,000 families in Kabul’s 17th Police District.
Mohammad Nabi Bahar, spokesperson for the General Directorate of State-Owned Companies, said the project will combine surface water from the Shah wa Arus Dam with supplies from five deep wells.
The system is designed to provide a total of 200 litres of water per second, comprising 100 litres per second from the dam and another 100 litres per second from the wells.
Bahar said the project is expected to be completed and handed over for public use within three years.
The initiative aims to strengthen water supply infrastructure in the 17th district and improve residents’ access to drinking water.
With an estimated investment of AFN 1 billion, the project represents a major planned infrastructure development for the Afghan capital.
Latest News
UNDP launches second phase of economic recovery programme in five Afghan provinces
UNDP said REVIVE II builds on the achievements of the programme’s initial phase, with the new stage intended to extend support and improve economic conditions for vulnerable communities.
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has launched the second phase of an economic recovery initiative aimed at strengthening livelihoods, restoring community infrastructure and supporting vulnerable communities across five Afghan provinces.
In an announcement on Monday, October 26, UNDP said the second phase of its Reviving Economic Activities and Improving Vulnerable Environments (REVIVE II) programme would expand recovery and reconstruction efforts, with financial support from the Republic of Korea.
The programme will cover Kabul, Paktia, Ghazni, Nangarhar and Kunar provinces, focusing on restoring social infrastructure, revitalising local economic activities and improving communities’ ability to withstand economic shocks.
UNDP said REVIVE II builds on the achievements of the programme’s initial phase, with the new stage intended to extend support and improve economic conditions for vulnerable communities.
However, the agency did not disclose the programme’s total budget, implementation timeline or the number of people expected to benefit.
The initiative comes as Afghanistan continues to face significant challenges in economic recovery and the creation of sustainable livelihood opportunities, particularly for vulnerable communities seeking to rebuild their livelihoods and strengthen their resilience.
Latest News
Afghanistan opium ban shifts cultivation to Pakistan and Iran, experts warn
Pakistan’s southwestern Balochistan province appears to have become a key centre of opium cultivation in the border region, despite Islamabad’s denials of widespread production.
Afghanistan’s ban on opium cultivation has triggered a shift in production towards neighbouring Pakistan and Iran, turning parts of the three countries’ borderlands into a growing centre for the illicit drug trade, according to experts.
Opium production in Afghanistan has fallen sharply since the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) imposed a sweeping ban on poppy cultivation in 2022. However, cultivation has not been eliminated, while satellite imagery and interviews with farmers suggest production is expanding across Pakistan’s Balochistan province and Iran’s Sistan-Baluchistan region.
David Mansfield, a UK-based expert on Afghanistan’s illicit drug industry, told RFE/RL the combination of the ban and growing instability along the shared borders had created conditions for widespread poppy cultivation in Pakistan and Iran.
He warned that production could rise further in 2027, potentially increasing international heroin supplies, generating revenue for armed groups and intensifying regional violence.
Pakistan emerges as a major cultivation hub
Pakistan’s southwestern Balochistan province appears to have become a key centre of opium cultivation in the border region, despite Islamabad’s denials of widespread production.
Satellite analysis by British firm Alcis identified more than 9,000 hectares of poppy cultivation in Balochistan, with much of it concentrated in the districts of Loralai and Killa Abdullah.
The findings contrast with estimates from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, which has described opium production in Pakistan as marginal. The agency acknowledged, however, that limited data from countries surrounding Afghanistan makes it difficult to establish the full extent of cultivation.
Local farmers told Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty that poppy farming had expanded as drought, insecurity and declining returns from conventional crops undermined agricultural livelihoods.
The shift has also been encouraged by Afghan farmers who have crossed the border to lease land and work with local growers. Farmers from Afghanistan’s Kandahar and Helmand provinces are reportedly bringing their experience and investment into the region.
Some growers have invested in solar-powered wells, while poppies offer more lucrative returns than traditional crops and can be harvested twice a year.
Mansfield said some farmers had doubled the land devoted to poppy cultivation in 2026, raising concerns about a further expansion next year.
Poppy cultivation spreads across Iran
A similar trend is emerging in Iran, where Afghan farmers are reportedly working as tenants and sharecroppers, drawing on family and community connections across the border.
Cultivation has been reported in several Iranian provinces, including Razavi Khorasan, Kermanshah, Lorestan and Fars. Sistan-Baluchistan, one of the country’s poorest provinces, appears to remain the main production centre.
Satellite imagery from 2026 indicates extensive poppy fields in parts of the province, with some farms using drip irrigation — an investment that may suggest growers expect a relatively low risk of eradication, RFE/RL reported.
According to Mansfield, cultivation is increasingly shifting from mixed farming to large-scale production in which entire plots are devoted to poppies.
Iran’s authorities have also been grappling with wider security and political pressures, while separatist and militant activity has intensified in Sistan-Baluchistan. Experts warn that the combination of economic hardship, insecurity and limited enforcement could encourage further expansion in 2027.
Opium cultivation persists in Afghanistan
RFE/RL meanwhile also reported that despite the ban, poppy cultivation is also showing signs of a resurgence inside Afghanistan.
Production remains concentrated in Badakhshan province in the northeast, which is estimated to account for around half of the country’s opium output, alongside several southwestern provinces.
Drought, mounting debt and economic hardship have pushed some farmers to defy the restrictions, while enforcement campaigns have triggered protests in affected communities.
Mansfield said cultivation remained widespread across both rain-fed and irrigated land in Badakhshan in 2026. In southwestern Afghanistan, cultivation almost doubled between 2025 and 2026, although it remained concentrated in remote areas and was sometimes concealed within wheat fields or behind household walls.
Authorities have also issued a directive prohibiting searches of homes for poppy or opium without a court order, a measure that experts view as a possible concession amid the risk of further unrest.
Mansfield warned that farmers could interpret the restriction as a sign that cultivation would be tolerated in areas beyond the reach of enforcement.
The developments point to a shifting regional drug economy, with production moving across borders rather than disappearing. Experts say the expansion of opium cultivation in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran could strengthen illicit networks, provide funding for armed groups and worsen insecurity across an already volatile region.
-
Latest News5 days agoAfghanistan’s new Wakhan road to China faces major hurdles
-
Science & Technology5 days agoGovernments take websites offline as critical cyber flaws trigger global alert
-
Latest News5 days agoCSTO to supply Tajikistan with weapons to strengthen Afghan border
-
Latest News3 days agoUS Central Asia strategy faces challenges linked to Afghanistan’s political and security situation
-
Latest News5 days agoRussia to expand security and defence cooperation with Afghanistan
-
Business4 days agoPakistan exporters suffer billions in losses as Afghanistan trade halt continues
-
Sport3 days agoAfghanistan defeat Zimbabwe to win Tri-Series ahead of 2027 Cricket World Cup
-
Business3 days agoIMF forecasts 1.3 percent regional economic contraction in 2026
