Latest News
US , Britain sent Special Forces to Helmand
The U.S. and Britain have deployed at least four special-operations teams to the Afghan province of Helmand, stepping up their direct intervention in support of struggling Afghan government forces trying to fight off advances by Taliban militants.
The Taliban have taken control of at least four districts in Helmand, a major focus of U.S. and U.K. combat operations until late last year, and now threaten areas bordering the provincial capital Lashkar Gah, local officials said.
At least 2,000 Afghan forces have been killed or wounded in Helmand in the past year, according to a Western official who recently reported on the deteriorating security situation in the southern Afghan province.
Preventing the provincial capital from falling into the hands of the Taliban is a priority for U.S. Army Gen. John Campbell, the commander of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led military coalition in Afghanistan, coalition officials said.
In September, Taliban fighters in a matter of hours seized another provincial capital, Kunduz, and held it for several days, delivering a huge shock to coalition officials. U.S. Special Forces were deployed to help Afghan forces drive out the rebels.
In a bid to avert a similar Taliban takeover in Helmand, at least three Special Forces Operational Detachment Alpha units—so-called A-Teams—have been moved to the province to join a unit deployed there this year, a U.S. security source based in the province said.
At least one British special-operations team is also in Helmand, marking the first return of U.K. troops to the province since last year, this person added.
A U.S. Special Operations spokesman confirmed in an email that “additional U.S. special forces have been sent to augment our Train, Advise, and Assist mission in Helmand.” The spokesman declined to comment on the number of teams.
The role of the A-Teams in Helmand is to advise Afghan troops as part of the NATO support mission, but they often accompany Afghan forces during military operations and fight when they are threatened. They are also authorized to call in airstrikes.
Afghan security forces assumed responsibility for combat operations from the NATO-led coalition this year. Yet while the U.S. has strict rules setting forth when its forces can provide direct combat assistance to Afghan forces, the brief seizure of Kunduz has led to a more aggressive approach by the U.S.
“The rules were loosened because of the way things were going,” another Western official said.
The risks entailed by joint operations involving airstrikes were evident in Kunduz. A U.S. Air Force AC-130 providing air support during the offensive to retake the city bombed a hospital run by Doctors Without Borders, killing more than 40 people.
Gen. Campbell told reporters in Kabul in November that some Americans involved in the operation hadn’t followed the rules of engagement and had been suspended from duty pending a disciplinary review. President Barack Obama apologized for the airstrike.
An A-Team is usually made up of 12 men trained in a particular military specialty and deployed for the riskiest military operations. In Afghanistan, these operations consist of nighttime raids aimed at capturing or killing Taliban militants. Such missions have increased in Helmand in the weeks since the latest team arrived, Afghan officials said.
A member of the Afghan military described a raid Sunday night in Helmand’s Nahr e-Saraj district that he said killed 14 Taliban fighters. Three U.S. combat helicopters participated in the joint U.S.-Afghan operation, he said.
A report in November by the Afghan Interior Ministry said seven Taliban fighters had been killed in a joint U.S.-Afghan special-forces raid in the village of Pahin, also in Nahr e-Saraj.
Both U.S. and Afghan officials declined to comment on the raids. “Our forces receive air support from the foreigners, and they are only assisting Afghan forces in advisory role on the ground,” said Afghan Army Gen. Daulat Waziri, responding to questions about military operations in Helmand.
For the Taliban, Helmand is important commercially—opium production in the province is an important source of revenue. The group’s fighters have focused on the roads to several districts, planting mines and ambushing government reinforcements.
Police said their checkpoints are frequently targeted and that it was only a matter of time before their last remaining strongholds collapse.
In October, 23 Afghan troops manning a checkpoint were killed by the Taliban during an all-night fight. Reinforcements from their headquarters, just a mile away, never arrived, said the U.S. security source in Helmand.
“We are in the front line but we haven’t received our salaries for two months and don’t have food,” said Ahmad Shah, a local police commander stationed in the district of Marjah. “We knock on people’s door to ask them to provide us food.”
Afghan officials acknowledged the challenges facing government forces in Helmand but denied that the Taliban had made significant gains in the province. Omar Zwak, a spokesman for Helmand’s governor, said government forces were present in all but two of the province’s 13 districts.
Mr. Zwak declined to comment on nighttime raids, saying U.S. and Afghan officials were discussing the possibility of additional support.
Helmand has seen some of the bloodiest fighting following the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 that forced the Taliban from power.
It hosted adjacent U.S. and British bases known as Camp Leatherneck and Camp Bastion, which were formally handed over last October. The bases were the logistical hub and headquarters for allied military operations in the province and once housed some 40,000 U.S. and coalition troops.
The majority of the 378 U.S. Marines killed in Afghanistan during the war died in Helmand. The British lost some 450 personnel, most of them in the province, too.
Source: Wall Street Journal
Latest News
EU announces 25 million euros to boost food security and resilience in Afghanistan
The European Union (EU) has announced a 25 million euros contribution through the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) to strengthen community resilience and promote more nutritious diets across Afghanistan.
“The European Union’s new contribution to WFP demonstrates our continued commitment to the Afghan people, notably women, children, and vulnerable local communities,” said Veronika Boskovic-Pohar, EU Chargé d’affaires in Afghanistan. “Agriculture and food value chains must be equipped to bolster Afghans’ nutrition, health, and economic resilience. Through our integrated approach to climate resilience, we are also helping vulnerable rural communities protect their livelihoods and income against natural disasters and long-term devastating impacts of climate change.”
The funding will support WFP initiatives focused on improving food value chains and climate adaptation. Key projects include upgrading community assets such as flood protection walls and irrigation systems, reducing climate-related risks, and safeguarding productive assets essential for local economic stability.
A significant portion of the investment will build on WFP’s school meals programme, training women’s associations and youth entrepreneurs to supply fresh, fortified snacks to schoolchildren. This approach aims to stimulate local economies while creating sustainable livelihood opportunities.
John Aylieff, WFP Representative and Country Director in Afghanistan, expressed gratitude for the EU’s support, noting that the investment aims to deliver a “triple return: stronger livelihoods and resilience, more robust local food systems, and expanded opportunities for women and youth.”
Latest News
U.S. urges UNAMA mandate review over ‘lack of results’ in Afghanistan
Jennifer Locetta, the U.S. representative to the United Nations for Special Political Affairs, told the Security Council on Wednesday that international engagement with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has so far produced no meaningful results, and UNAMA’s mandate must be reassessed.
“As we have heard, the people of Afghanistan continue to endure significant hardships, including human rights violations, poverty, unemployment, limited access to basic services, and unreasonable restrictions on women’s rights. The Taliban (IEA) are responsible for these hardships and suffering because of the policies they have chosen,” Lucetta said.
She added: “Quite simply, the Taliban (IEA) are not good faith interlocutors. And they do not care about the well-being of the Afghan people. They impede and manipulate support from the international community.”
Lucetta also criticized the Taliban (IEA) for continuing “hostage diplomacy,” ignoring the basic needs of the Afghan people, obstructing UNAMA’s operations, and showing little willingness to fulfill their international obligations. “This includes the Doha process, where the Taliban (IEA) do not participate in good faith,” she said.
She stressed that the Security Council must take into account the lack of results from international aid and engagement in Afghanistan, and remain skeptical of the IEA when considering UNAMA’s future.
“All special political missions, including UNAMA, need to adapt to changing conditions on the ground. If Taliban conditions prevent UNAMA from carrying out these tasks, then the Council should consider realigning its mandate to these realities. In the future, it should focus on core peace and security issues guided by clear and achievable benchmarks,” Lucetta said.
The U.S. official emphasized that Washington’s top priority in Afghanistan remains the protection of American citizens and the homeland, including reducing terrorism threats emanating from Afghanistan and ensuring the freedom of individuals unjustly detained.
The Islamic Emirate has previously denied human rights violations and emphasized that the existing laws in Afghanistan are based on Sharia and that the international community must respect them.
Latest News
Iran says an inclusive government in Afghanistan is essential to prevent renewed conflict
-
Sport4 days agoILT20: Nissanka fires Gulf Giants to four-wicket win over Dubai Capitals
-
Business4 days agoAfghanistan signs agreement with DP World to bolster ports infrastructure
-
Latest News4 days agoSyria’s President challenges West’s counter-terrorism claims in Afghanistan and Iraq
-
Business5 days agoPakistan says trade with Afghanistan will remain suspended until security assurances
-
Latest News4 days agoDoha Forum spotlights Afghanistan’s emerging role in regional connectivity
-
Latest News5 days agoAustralia imposes sanctions, travel bans on four IEA officials
-
Latest News4 days agoUS sets 2027 deadline for Europe-led NATO defense, officials say
-
3 days agoIran seeks broad expansion of cooperation with Afghanistan

