Connect with us

Latest News

Afghan allies sue Trump administration over travel ban blocking family reunification

According to the lawsuit, the Department of State has refused to issue travel documents for the families of Afghans who were granted derivative asylum under the “follow-to-join” process.

Published

on

Seven Afghan nationals who were granted asylum in the United States have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s application of its renewed “travel ban,” which has prevented their families from joining them in the country despite prior approval from immigration authorities.

The case, filed on October 21 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, names as defendants the U.S. Department of State, Secretary Marco Rubio, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Secretary Kristi Noem, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), its Director Joseph B. Edlow, and the United States government, The Diplomat reported.

The International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), along with Williams & Connolly LLP and Keler & Kershow PLLC, is representing the plaintiffs — seven Afghans and 28 of their family members, including spouses and children.

According to the lawsuit, the Department of State has refused to issue travel documents for the families of Afghans who were granted derivative asylum under the “follow-to-join” process, citing compliance with President Donald Trump’s June 4 travel ban proclamation. The plaintiffs argue that this interpretation is unlawful because the proclamation explicitly exempts asylum seekers and refugees.

“Once again, the Trump administration is failing our Afghan allies,” said Pedro Sepulveda Jr., a litigation fellow at IRAP. “Our clients put their lives in danger for the United States and are now being told their loved ones are banned from this country, even though their petitions were approved by DHS.”

Trump’s June 4 proclamation reinstated and expanded the earlier travel ban, barring entry to citizens from 12 countries — including Afghanistan, Myanmar, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen — while imposing partial restrictions on seven others. The order cited security concerns and the Islamic Emirate’s control of Afghanistan, claiming the country lacked a “competent or cooperative central authority” for document verification.

Despite this, the proclamation specifically stated that it “shall not apply to an individual who has been granted asylum by the United States” or refugees already admitted, nor should it limit anyone’s right to seek asylum or humanitarian protection under U.S. law.

Afghan plaintiffs and their families

The plaintiffs include several former Afghan Air Force pilots, mechanics, and bodyguards who worked closely with U.S. and coalition forces before the fall of Kabul in August 2021. Some were among those who flew their aircraft to Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to avoid capture, later entering the U.S. through Operation Allies Refuge — later renamed Operation Allies Welcome — and were granted asylum.

Their wives and children, however, remain stranded abroad, many of them in Pakistan or other third countries, after being denied U.S. entry despite having been approved for family reunification. The lawsuit states that the denial letters were “boilerplate,” some even issued before consular interviews took place.

The lawsuit alleges that the State Department, DHS, and USCIS have “unlawfully applied” the travel ban to Afghans who are explicitly exempt, thereby violating federal law and the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. It calls for the immediate issuance of travel documents to allow the families to reunite with their loved ones in the United States.

IRAP and other advocacy groups have condemned the administration’s approach as a betrayal of Afghan allies who risked their lives for U.S. missions.

“The government is misinterpreting the law and putting families in harm’s way,” Sepulveda said. “These individuals stood with America — and now, America must stand by them.”

The case underscores ongoing tensions over immigration and refugee policy under the revived travel ban, particularly its impact on Afghans who aided U.S. military and diplomatic efforts during two decades of conflict.

Latest News

US reviews green cards from 19 countries; Suspends Afghan-related processing

In a parallel move, DHS has frozen Afghan immigration cases and is reviewing asylum approvals granted under the Biden Administration.

Published

on

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has initiated a sweeping review of green cards issued to individuals from 19 “countries of concern,” while the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has indefinitely halted the processing of Afghan-related immigration requests.

USCIS Director Joe Edlow confirmed on X that the agency will re-examine all permanent resident cards granted to nationals of the 19 countries listed in President Donald Trump’s June Presidential Proclamation.

The countries include Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Venezuela, Myanmar, and others where U.S. officials say document verification and security assessments remain challenging.

Edlow said the review will evaluate “negative, country-specific factors,” including the credibility and reliability of identity documents produced by these nations.

In a parallel move, DHS has frozen Afghan immigration cases and is reviewing asylum approvals granted under the Biden Administration.

Trump has framed the policy as part of a broader effort to “permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries,” revoke federal benefits for noncitizens, and increase denaturalization actions against individuals deemed security risks.

Supporters of the administration’s approach argue that heightened scrutiny is necessary for national security. Critics, however, warn that the measures could trigger mass delays, denials, and potential revocations of legal status for thousands of residents and applicants.

The new rules, implemented immediately on November 27, will significantly increase immigration screening for nationals of the 19 designated countries.

Employers with foreign staff from these regions have been advised to closely monitor the immigration status of affected employees, as the policy shift may lead to prolonged uncertainty and additional compliance challenges.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Qatari PM: Dialogue with non-state actors key to regional peace

He also criticised political figures who, he said, distort Qatar’s role for domestic gain, despite its mediation leading to hostage releases, humanitarian pauses, and ceasefires.

Published

on

Qatar’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani urged direct engagement with non-state actors as essential to resolving conflicts across the region, from Afghanistan to Gaza.

Speaking at the 23rd Doha Forum, he said peace efforts cannot succeed if major actors on the ground are excluded. “You cannot reach a solution if no one is speaking to non-state actors,” he told a session moderated by US journalist Tucker Carlson.

Sheikh Mohammed noted that Qatar’s mediation model—used in Afghan peace talks and repeated ceasefire efforts in Gaza—is built on facilitating communication between all sides. He revealed that both Hamas and the Taliban opened political offices in Doha at the request of the United States to maintain reliable channels for negotiations.

Addressing accusations that Qatari aid to Gaza was diverted to Hamas, he stressed that all funds were delivered transparently to civilians, with oversight from the US and coordination with Israel.

He also criticised political figures who, he said, distort Qatar’s role for domestic gain, despite its mediation leading to hostage releases, humanitarian pauses, and ceasefires.

The Qatari PM condemned Israel’s strike on Qatari territory in September as an “unprecedented” breach of diplomatic norms and said reconstruction of Gaza must be the responsibility of those who caused the destruction.

This year’s Doha Forum brings together more than 5,000 participants from 162 countries to discuss conflict resolution, humanitarian crises, and global governance.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Doha Forum: Dialogue between Afghanistan and Pakistan key to regional connectivity

Qanit urged both countries to take a long-term view. “It is essential for Pakistan and Afghanistan to sit together and resolve these problems. If these crises continue, confidence in regional connectivity will erode.”

Published

on

At the Doha Forum on Saturday, Afghan officials underscored the critical need for renewed dialogue between Afghanistan and Pakistan, warning that recent political tensions risk undermining the region’s broader connectivity and integration goals.

Abdul Hai Qanit, Director of the Center for Strategic Studies at Afghanistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told participants that constructive engagement between Kabul and Islamabad is essential for long-term stability and economic cooperation.

“We can resolve all issues through dialogue,” Qanit said. “But we must not reach a point of no return, as there are significant interests tied to regional integration.”

He noted that Afghanistan has a strong interest in maintaining positive relations with Pakistan, but cautioned that recent developments are jeopardizing shared progress.

“Trade routes are being weaponized, geography is being politicized, and corridors are being used as leverage in political disputes,” he said. “This threatens the very concept of regional integration.”

Qanit urged both countries to take a long-term view. “It is essential for Pakistan and Afghanistan to sit together and resolve these problems. If these crises continue, confidence in regional connectivity will erode.”

Despite current tensions, he expressed optimism that the situation is temporary. “I believe this is a short-term crisis. The Pakistan-Afghanistan relationship will return to a positive track. Afghanistan can advance ongoing projects and serve not as a threat, but as a hub linking South Asia and Central Asia.”

Echoing this focus on cooperation, Dr. Eldor Aripov, Director of Uzbekistan’s Institute for Strategic and Interregional Studies, emphasized that economic engagement remains the most effective way to support Afghanistan’s development.

“Different approaches are needed,” he said. “Our position is clear: economic cooperation is the best tool to help Afghanistan move forward.”

As discussions at the Doha Forum continue, regional leaders are exploring pathways to strengthen cross-border economic projects and expand connectivity across South and Central Asia.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Ariana News. All rights reserved!