Latest News
IEA responds to UN report, says Afghanistan should not be viewed as an ‘ungoverned space’
The Islamic Emirate said Tuesday that Afghanistan should not be viewed as a political vacuum nor as an “ungoverned space” by the international community as the country has a “strong central government that is perfectly capable of managing its internal affairs”.
This was stated in a document, titled Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s view on assessment by UN Special Coordinator. The document seen by Ariana News, was in response to the UN Special Coordinator Feridun Sinirlioglu’s report to the UN last week.
Sinirlioglu gave three recommendations regarding Afghanistan – continuing UN-convened special envoys’ meetings; appointing a UN special envoy to address Afghanistan’s issues and draw up a roadmap for the country’s future; and forming an international contact group.
In response to this report, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan said in the document that the “establishment of parallel mechanisms by the United Nations such as a Special Envoy are unacceptable.”
The IEA said the country possesses a strong government capable of discharging the country’s national and international obligations. “This government is obligated to take into consideration the religious values and national interests of the country during all engagements, and will not allow anyone to interfere in our internal affairs,” read the document.
The IEA said however that the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, and the UN Security Council’s continued interest in engagement with Afghanistan and any attempts at improving dialogue and engagement “are most welcome”.
In response the claims by the UN special envoy on women’s rights abuses, the IEA said: “The end of armed conflict, implementation of a general amnesty, and decrees by our leader protecting the fundamental rights of women, including the right to inheritance, consensual marriage, and free and unfettered access to justice have enabled Afghan women to secure some of their most basic rights and seek enforcement through government institutions.”
The IEA stated that hundreds of thousands of women continue to work in the public sector, specifically in education, health, security and other ministries. “Approximately 23.4% of all civil servants are women,” the document read.
The IEA also stated that a major initiative to promote women entrepreneurs has been launched; that it has rounded up thousands of street beggars – majority of which were women. These women now receive a regular stipend.
According to the document, the IEA’s strong central government, which extends to all corners of the country, has unified Afghanistan politically and socially.
“In a short period of time, the government has established a large and well-trained security force that has effectively provided security and combated Daesh,” read the document.
Following decades of conflict, the newfound security in the country has enabled the neighboring and regional states to “expand economic ties with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, and Afghanistan is beginning to be utilized as an indispensable node in regional connectivity,” read the document adding that a complete ban on the cultivation, use and dealing of drugs has been effective.
The IEA however blasted the international community for its “malicious and illegal sanctions. Noting other achievements made, the IEA stated “the government’s sound economic policies have helped Afghanistan stave off economic pressures. Inflation today is virtually in the negative and the country’s currency is outperforming most world currencies.”
On the issue of an inclusive government, the IEA said: “The Afghan government will continue to strive to broaden the makeup of governance to the greatest extent possible.
“Any attempts to bring back failed figures from the past or form a shares-based government is in stark conflict with the historical sacrifices of Afghans in pursuit of their independence. It is also worth noting that along with a range of other issues, the definition of inclusiveness varies
profoundly between Afghans and some foreigners.
“One reason for approval of the Emirate among the Afghans is that it freed them from the clutches of the former corrupt and oppressive rulers, and
eliminated warlordism from the country,” the document read.
On Sinirlioglu’s recommendations, the IEA stated it “welcomes recommendations of the assessment that supports the strengthening of national economy of Afghanistan, opens the pathway to the recognition of the current government and encourages regional connectivity and transit via Afghanistan.”
The IEA went on to state that Afghanistan currently has a strong central government that represents the unique diversity of Afghans and that the country should not be viewed as a conflict zone. They once again reiterated that the Islamic Emirate will not allow anyone to interfere in the country’s internal affairs.
However, the IEA stated that it hopes precedence is given to issues “of greater importance such as resolving sanctions, asset freezes and banking restrictions, and nurturing engagement based on mutual respect and interests is given precedence over attempts to revive problems and disputes that have already been settled.”
The IEA also stated it reiterates “that efforts of grudge-motivated pressures should not be exerted on the government of Afghanistan which may prove detrimental to the current balanced policy of the Islamic Emirate.”
Latest News
Airstrike on Kabul drug rehabilitation centre sparks legal concerns
Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for Research, Isabelle Lassee, said the scale of casualties suggests the presence of a significant civilian population at the site.
An airstrike on a drug rehabilitation facility in Kabul has drawn sharp criticism from Amnesty International, raising serious questions about compliance with international humanitarian law.
The strike, carried out on 16 March, targeted a site at Camp Phoenix, a former military base that has functioned largely as a rehabilitation centre since 2016. Pakistani officials have claimed the attack was aimed at an ammunition depot allegedly located within the compound.
Responding to those claims, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for Research, Isabelle Lassee, said the scale of casualties suggests the presence of a significant civilian population at the site.
“While the total number of casualties has yet to be independently verified, it is clear that the attack caused extensive civilian harm, with reports indicating hundreds killed or injured,” she said.
Lassee emphasized that the facility was widely known to house civilians undergoing treatment, and warned that any military action should have taken this into account. “Pakistan’s military should have taken all feasible precautions to avoid harming civilians and civilian infrastructure,” she added.
She further noted that even if a military target had been present within the compound, international law requires that any strike be proportionate, ensuring that civilian harm is not excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
“The scale of destruction raises serious concerns about whether an adequate proportionality assessment was conducted and whether sufficient steps were taken to verify the target and minimize civilian casualties,” Lassee said.
Amnesty International has called on Pakistani authorities to disclose the intelligence behind the strike and to launch an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into the incident. The organization stressed that findings should be made public to ensure accountability.
The group also urged all parties involved in the conflict to adhere strictly to international humanitarian law and to protect civilian infrastructure, including medical and rehabilitation facilities.
The airstrike formed part of Pakistan’s “Operation Ghazab Lil Haq,” which included strikes in both Kabul and Nangarhar Province. The targeted rehabilitation centre, known as Omid, reportedly had the capacity to accommodate around 2,000 individuals.
Casualty figures remain contested. Islamic Emirate officials claim more than 400 civilians were killed and over 200 injured, though these numbers have not been independently verified. The United Nations has so far confirmed 143 deaths.
The strike comes amid escalating tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan. According to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, at least 76 civilian casualties had already been recorded since the conflict intensified in February.
Pakistani officials, meanwhile, reported civilian casualties on their side of the border, including four deaths in Bajaur district on 15 March and the killing of a child in North Waziristan earlier in the month, allegedly due to cross-border fire from Afghanistan.
The latest developments underscore growing concerns about civilian safety as hostilities between the two countries continue to intensify.
Latest News
Afghanistan expresses condolences after deadly helicopter crash in Qatar
Latest News
Pakistan seeks Russian mediation to resolve Afghanistan tensions
Pakistan’s ambassador to Russia, Faisal Niaz Tirmizi, has confirmed that Islamabad has asked Moscow to mediate in the ongoing conflict with Afghanistan.
In an interview with Russian daily Izvestia, Tirmizi said Pakistan is engaging with Russia and appreciates the “wonderful offer” to help resolve tensions. He noted that proposals from Russia, China, Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia led to an agreement on a temporary ceasefire.
“We tell all our interlocutors: please tell the Taliban (IEA) not to use this opportunity simply to regroup, recuperate, rearm, and re-attack,” Tirmizi said. “Because such large states as Russia or Pakistan cannot be destabilized by terrorist acts.”
The ambassador emphasized that decades of war in Afghanistan have affected not only Kabul and Islamabad but also neighboring countries, including Iran, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and even Russia. “Therefore, we must all trade with each other, develop education, art, and culture. Terrorism is the wrong way to go,” he added.
The appeal for mediation comes amid rising cross-Durand Line tensions and violence that have killed hundreds and displaced thousands in recent weeks.
Pakistani officials have repeatedly claimed that militant attacks in the country are organized in Afghanistan.
The IEA however denies the claim saying that Afghanistan is not responsible for Pakistan’s “security failure.”
-
Latest News4 days agoPakistani shelling hits Kunar districts despite ‘pause in hostility’ over Eid
-
Sport3 days agoAfghanistan national buzkashi falls short in Kokpar World Championship semifinals
-
Regional4 days agoPakistan among top nuclear threats to America, US intelligence chief tells senate
-
Sport2 days agoIreland to host Afghanistan for ODI series in August
-
Latest News5 days agoPeshawar High Court grants bail to 68 detained Afghan nationals, including minors
-
World4 days agoUS weighs troop deployment as Iran war enters new phase
-
Latest News3 days agoMojtaba Khamenei calls for improved Afghanistan–Pakistan relations, offers help
-
Latest News4 days agoSecurity Sources: Pakistani military shelling in Kunar and Nuristan leaves female doctor dead
