Latest News
Petraeus downbeat about Afghanistan’s future post pullout
General David H. Petraeus, retired US Army general and former director of the CIA said on Saturday he fears the United States will come to regret their decision to withdraw all troops and warned of a possible civil war.
In an interview with VOA, Petraeus said despite measures being taken to mitigate risks by extremists from re-establishing safe havens in Afghanistan, he fears “that we will come to regret this because there could very well be the return of a sense of civil war, a reality of civil war.”
He said he sees “no willingness” on the Taliban’s part to commit to meaningful, verifiable and sustainable agreements “that would be necessary to enable some kind of sharing of power; some kind of again, diplomatic resolution of the issues and instead I see a Taliban who has gotten everything that they wanted from the negotiations.”
He stated the Taliban has gotten its leaders and fighters out of prison, under the Doha agreement signed between the United States and the Taliban in February last year.
“Now they are getting the U.S. to leave which then also means that our coalition partners leave,” and the foreign contractors who do the maintenance on military helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft for the Afghan defense force will also leave, he said.
He said based on this alone, one will see an erosion of security and the people will “fall back on their tribe, their ethnic group, their sectarian affiliation, their political party”.
“You may see again the kind of civil war that characterized the situation in Afghanistan after the collapse of the post-Soviet regime in Kabul which took place two or three years after the departure of Soviet forces and when the Soviet funding eventually ran out.”
But he said he had enormous admiration for the Afghan security forces who he said were fighting and dying for their country and for a democratically elected government.
“They’re fighting for a country that is very different from the one that the Taliban will establish if they are able to regain control of the country.”
He stated that should this happen, the Taliban would return Afghanistan to a “theoretic medieval government structure”.
But he said he hopes his fears are misplaced and that “this does not come to pass”.
Petraeus said he was concerned that foreign contractors might feel that once troops have withdrawn that security will not be adequate enough for them to remain, adding that he does “not see any willingness” on the Taliban’s part to “negotiate in good faith”.
He said he is aware that U.S. military commanders and American intelligence officers among other are working hard to identify ways to mitigate the risks of al-Qaeda or ISIS (Daesh) or other extremist group from establishing sanctuaries in Afghanistan,
He questioned however whether the U.S. would in fact get a base in a neighboring country stating that Pakistan has refused the request and so has Uzbekistan.
He pointed out that any flights out of bases in the Gulf states is a long commute – particularly for drones which he said had been the “unblinking eyes that were able to establish over so many areas in Afghanistan to identify when you see what could be extremist activity and the establishment of sanctuaries and
perhaps training bases and ranges and a variety of other facilities that might be the hub.”
He also said that the U.S. had destroyed on a number of occasions over the past 20 years attempts by al-Qaeda to re-establish bases in eastern Afghanistan and “more recently one down in southern Afghanistan, in Helmand province.”
This Petraeus said was “a bit of a surprise”.
However, he blamed the Taliban, the Haqqani network and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan for providing the grounds for terrorist organizations to establish themselves in Afghanistan.
Petraeus said it is these groups that are “eroding the security posture of Afghanistan, who are creating ungoverned spaces or spaces governed by the Taliban such as they are, and it is a fact that Islamist extremists will exploit ungoverned spaces anywhere in the Muslim world and that certainly includes Afghanistan.
He also said the U.S. has a “moral obligation” to Afghans who worked alongside American soldiers on the battlefield as interpreters, as well as those who played other roles, and said these people “and in many cases that of their family members” should be granted visas to live in the U.S.
He said while this is a long process, various options are being examined including some kind of real airlift of these individuals – even to a third Country where they could be processed.
“There is a recognition very much on Capitol Hill, certainly at the State Department in the Pentagon and increasingly in the White House that there is this moral obligation that we need to take care of those who did risk their lives as a result of what they did together with our forces.”
He said he thinks there will be some solution that will be forthcoming. “I just hope it is developed quickly enough so that we don’t end up leaving many of them behind and not meeting that very important obligation that we have incurred.”
He said he hopes however that his worst fears are not realized and that his assessment is inaccurate and that the Afghan security forces continue to receive solid assistance from the U.S. and NATO allies, from diplomats and aid workers and other international organizations.
He also said he hopes the Afghan security forces show they can stand up to the Taliban on their own and that contractors stay on in Afghanistan to maintain the equipment and weapons systems.
Petraeus also stated he hopes the Taliban will eventually engage in “true negotiations” and be willing to compromise on some issues.
He said however he does not see “enormous leverage” for U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad’s continued diplomatic efforts “given that we have told the Taliban that we are leaving.”
Latest News
Pentagon panel completes key phase of Afghanistan withdrawal review, vows full accounting
A final report is expected to be presented to the Defense Secretary and released publicly in the coming months.
The United States Department of Defense said a special review panel examining the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal has completed a major phase of its work, including extensive interviews with senior military and civilian leaders.
In a statement, the department said the Afghanistan Withdrawal Special Review Panel—chaired by Sean Parnell—has concluded the substantive portion of its interviews as part of what officials describe as one of the most comprehensive after-action military reviews in modern history.
According to the department, the panel was established by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the direction of Donald Trump. Its mandate is to conduct a full-scale examination of the planning and execution of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021.
Officials said the panel interviewed a wide range of key figures involved in the withdrawal, including senior military leaders such as Mark A. Milley, Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., and Austin S. Miller.
In addition to interviews, the panel has reviewed more than nine million documents gathered from multiple U.S. government agencies and prior Defense Department efforts. The department noted this far exceeds the scope of an earlier review conducted under former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, which examined roughly 3,000 documents.
“The Secretary Austin-led effort was significantly narrower in scope and over-classified at the highest levels, limiting public access to critical information,” the statement said.
The Defense Department said the ongoing review aims to deliver the most transparent and comprehensive account to date of the events surrounding the withdrawal, including identifying systemic, institutional, and leadership failures that contributed to the collapse of the former Afghan government.
“Our purpose is to ensure that such a tragedy is never repeated,” the statement said, emphasizing accountability to the American public as a central objective.
The department added that the panel is now working to integrate its findings, cross-reference previous reviews, and finalize recommendations. A final report is expected to be presented to the Defense Secretary and released publicly in the coming months.
Latest News
Afghans turn to riverbed gold hunting amid scarce jobs
Hundreds of men in eastern Afghanistan are scouring riverbeds for tiny flecks of gold as they seek alternative sources of income in a country with limited employment opportunities, according to recent reports.
In Kunar province, along the rugged slopes of the Hindu Kush near Pakistan, groups of workers dig into the rocky bed of the Kunar River, sifting through stones and sediment in search of gold dust.
The labour-intensive process involves excavating rocks from dry sections of the riverbed and washing them with water to separate out potential gold particles. In some areas, men carry heavy sacks of material down steep slopes before filtering it through sieves and pans.
For many, the work is driven by economic necessity. One miner, a father of eight who left construction work in Kabul, said the lack of job opportunities had forced him to find income wherever possible.
Despite the effort, returns are modest. Gold pieces are often “smaller than a grain of wheat,” though some workers report finding up to one gram in a week, which can fetch around 8,000 Afghanis (about $125).
Gold panning in the region has been practiced for more than a decade, with techniques passed on from miners in other parts of the country. Local officials estimate that thousands of people are now engaged in the activity, which is permitted when done using traditional methods.
Authorities have, however, faced pressure from residents to curb the use of heavy machinery in mining, citing concerns about environmental damage to rivers and surrounding mountains.
Afghanistan’s mineral resources have long been underdeveloped due to decades of conflict, but interest in the sector has grown in recent years, with authorities promoting mining as a potential driver of economic activity.
Latest News
Uzbekistan, Norway stress continued dialogue on Afghanistan settlement
The two sides also exchanged views on Afghanistan’s economic recovery and discussed prospects for integrating the country into broader regional connectivity initiatives.
Uzbekistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan, Ismatulla Irgashev, held talks with Norway’s newly appointed ambassador, Helene Sand Andresen, focusing on efforts to sustain dialogue on Afghanistan’s future, officials said.
According to Uzbekistan’s Foreign Ministry, the meeting centred on the current state of bilateral cooperation related to Afghanistan and underscored a shared commitment to maintaining regular engagement on the Afghan settlement process.
Andresen praised Uzbekistan’s role in promoting a coordinated regional approach to Afghanistan, highlighting Tashkent’s efforts to build consensus among neighbouring countries.
The two sides also exchanged views on Afghanistan’s economic recovery and discussed prospects for integrating the country into broader regional connectivity initiatives.
-
Latest News4 days agoChina establishes new Xinjiang county near sensitive border region
-
Latest News5 days agoUN warns of critical funding shortfall for humanitarian aid in Afghanistan
-
Latest News3 days agoPakistan urged to halt deportation of Afghan refugees as concerns mount
-
Latest News5 days agoGlobal outrage triggered after deadly attack on civilians in Herat
-
Latest News5 days agoIEA FM calls Kabul-Pakistan talks ‘positive’ in meeting with Turkish envoy
-
Health5 days agoAfghanistan launches first nationwide polio vaccination campaign of 2026
-
Business3 days agoAfghanistan, Uzbekistan strengthen ties with $524 million in trade deals
-
International Sports4 days agoRCB, Gujarat Titans secure wins in Sunday IPL double-header
