Latest News
Aid agencies warn of ‘life-threatening consequences’ of NGO ban
Heads of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee on Afghanistan, under the umbrella of the World Health Organization, have collectively said banning women from humanitarian work has immediate life-threatening consequences for all Afghans.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, the agencies said the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s (IEA) decision to ban women from working for NGOs was a “major blow for vulnerable communities, for women, for children, and for the entire country.”
The organizations said female staff are key to every aspect of the humanitarian response in Afghanistan.
“They are teachers, nutrition experts, team leaders, community health workers, vaccinators, nurses, doctors, and heads of organizations. They have access to populations that their male colleagues cannot reach and are critical to safeguarding the communities we serve,” read the statement.
“They save lives,” the organization said.
Their professional expertise is indispensable and their participation in aid delivery is “not negotiable and must continue”, the statement noted.
Since the IEA’s announcement on Saturday, some programmes have had to stop temporarily due to the lack of female staff. “This comes at a time when more than 28 million people in Afghanistan, including millions of women and children, require assistance to survive as the country grapples with the risk of famine conditions, economic decline, entrenched poverty and a brutal winter,” the statement read.
However, the agencies said they will “endeavor to continue lifesaving, time-critical activities unless impeded”.
“But we foresee that many activities will need to be paused as we cannot deliver principled humanitarian assistance without female aid workers.
“We urge the de facto authorities to reconsider and reverse this directive, and all directives banning women from schools, universities and public life. No country can afford to exclude half of its population from contributing to society,” the statement read.
Signatories to the statement were as follows:
- Mr. Martin Griffiths, Emergency Relief Coordinator and Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
- Mr. Qu Dongyu, Director-General, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
- Ms. Shahin Ashraf, Chair, International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA) Board, (Islamic Relief)
- Mr. Ignacio Packer, Executive Director, International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA)
- Ms. Miriam Sapiro, President and Chief Executive Officer, InterAction
- Ms. Tjada D’Oyen McKenna, Chief Eexcutive Officer, Mercy Corps
- Ms. Janti Soerpinto, President and Chief Executive Officer, Save the Children US
- Mr. António Vitorino, Director General, International Organization for Migration (IOM)
- Mr. Volker Turk, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
- Mr. Andrew Morley, President and Chief Executive Officer, World Vision International
- Ms. Sofia Sprechmann Sineiro, Secretary-General, CARE International
- Ms. Paula Gaviria Betancur, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons (UN SR on HR of IDPs)
- Mr. Achim Steiner, Administrator, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
- Dr. Natalia Kanem, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
- Ms. Maimunah Mohd Sharif, Executive Director, United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat)
- Mr. Filippo Grandi, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
- Ms. Catherine Russell, Executive Director, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
- Ms. Sima Bahous, Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director (UN Women)
- Mr. David Beasley, Executive Director, World Food Programme (WFP)
- Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO)
In another collective statement, issued Thursday, the Foreign Ministers of Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States and the High Representative of the European Union said they are gravely concerned that the order barring female NGOs from the workplace puts millions of Afghans at risk.
“We call on the Taliban to urgently reverse this decision,” they said.
“Unless they (women) participate in aid delivery in Afghanistan, NGOs will be unable to reach the country’s most vulnerable people to provide food, medicine, winterization, and other materials and services they need to live,” said the group of foreign ministers.
Latest News
Former US officials urge halt to plan relocating Afghan refugees from Qatar to Congo
Hundreds of former U.S. officials are calling on Washington to cancel a reported plan to relocate Afghan refugees from Qatar to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
In an open letter addressed to the U.S. State Department, more than 600 former civilian and military officials, along with around 100 organizations, urged the administration to stop the proposed transfer. The letter was sent to Marco Rubio.
The signatories argue that the Afghan nationals in question were brought to Qatar by the United States to complete legal immigration procedures after undergoing extensive security vetting. The letter states that while the individuals were cleared for resettlement in the United States, they are now being considered for relocation to Congo, a country for which they were never screened.
“Those individuals were vetted and approved for the United States, not for the Democratic Republic of the Congo,” the letter reads.
According to the report, more than 1,100 Afghan allies and their family members are currently being held at Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar under U.S. supervision. Around 800 of them have already completed all security checks and received authorization to travel to the United States. More than half are women and children, and many have remained in transit limbo for over 15 months.
The situation has drawn criticism from former officials and policy observers, who describe the proposed relocation as a betrayal of Afghan allies who supported U.S. missions and risked their lives during the war in Afghanistan. Critics also warn that the move could damage U.S. credibility with future partners.
Several members of the U.S. Congress had previously expressed opposition to the proposal, cautioning that it could significantly undermine trust in the United States among its allies.
Latest News
Ex-Pakistan envoy Durrani urges non-interference in Afghanistan’s internal affairs
Latest News
Uzbekistan and Japan discuss joint projects for Afghanistan’s socio-economic development
-
Sport5 days agoAfghanistan set for Maldives four-nation tournament
-
Business5 days agoKazakhstan grain exports to Afghanistan jump sharply
-
Regional5 days agoUS plans operation to assist ships stranded in Strait of Hormuz
-
Latest News5 days agoLeadership reshuffle announced across Afghanistan’s admin and security sectors
-
Latest News4 days agoPakistan’s Achakzai pushes for Afghanistan dialogue amid economic strain
-
Business3 days agoAfghanistan presses Chinese contractor over delays in Mes Aynak copper project
-
Latest News4 days agoFood prices surge 20% in Afghanistan as Hormuz crisis disrupts supply routes
-
Business3 days agoUzbekistan launches new cargo corridor linking China and Afghanistan
