Connect with us

Latest News

Washington struggling to isolate the Islamic Emirate

Published

on

A growing number of governments, including China, are going against Washington’s approach and are not treating the Islamic Emirate as a pariah regime.

According to an article published in Foreign Affairs, the United States and its allies’ approach has been to isolate the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA), by withholding diplomatic recognition and the benefits that usually come with normal diplomatic relations.

The approach that the United States and its allies and partners ultimately converged on was a commitment to continue engaging with the Afghan people—for example by providing substantial humanitarian aid—while withholding diplomatic recognition of the IEA and the benefits that usually come with normal diplomatic relations.

In fact, over the past two years, the United States has sought to build on this approach—not only by withholding its own recognition of the IEA but also by sustaining an international consensus on nonrecognition.

However, in the wake of concerted diplomatic efforts by the IEA to court neighboring countries and others in the region, several nations have been willing to accommodate the Islamic Emirate.

As Foreign Affairs reported, these states are among foreign governments that have embassies in Kabul and that host Afghan embassies overseas.

In January, several of these powers, including China, Iran, and Russia, even took part in a multilateral conference of their own hosted by the IEA.

Meanwhile, the IEA appears to be unmoved by global shaming, in particular when it comes to what they deem domestic affairs, such as the question of girls’ access to higher education and women’s right to work, Foreign Affairs reported.

Instead, Afghanistan’s leaders have portrayed international pressure as a violation of the country’s sovereignty, framing calls by Western leaders to uphold international norms as the latest episode in a long history of interference and intervention.

As the IEA has become more established in power, they have doubled down on a posture of resistance. As a result, rather than moderate their policies, they have pressed forward with further restrictions on women and social norms, Foreign Affairs reported.

The article stated that the erosion of the consensus on diplomatic isolation of the IEA raises important questions for Washington and its partners.

Nonrecognition is no longer a credible coercive tool, and if the United States seeks to influence the Islamic Emirate’s behavior, it must find other ways to achieve its desired aims.

Moreover, the Afghan case echoes similar situations Washington has faced with other difficult regimes, including its failure to prevent Arab countries from normalizing ties with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, despite crimes committed during the Syrian civil war, or to enforce a global consensus on the isolation of Russian President Vladimir Putin following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Today, attempts by the United States to impose pariah status on regimes it doesn’t like are running up against serious limits.

However, analysts disagree on why Russia and China have not taken the final step of recognizing the IEA. One possibility is that both powers still seek more assurances from Kabul, especially concerning potential terrorist threats from (Daesh) Islamic State Khorasan and a number of other groups.

And as long as the United States actively promotes a nonrecognition strategy, Moscow and Beijing can reap many of the benefits of recognizing the IEA without having to formally buck the international consensus, Foreign Affairs reported.

“Thus, they can reassure the Taliban (IEA) they are on their side (for example by backing them in last December’s UN Security Council proceedings, defending Taliban positions on the recommendations of a recent UN assessment) while also withholding full recognition,” the article read.

Overall, the IEA is not being treated as a pariah regime – despite concerted US efforts to maintain an international consensus on nonrecognition. On the contrary, the region, led by China, is gradually normalizing with Kabul—and intends to continue doing so.

The IEA, for their part, are being validated by this expanding engagement. Their sense of confidence and a loss of patience with conditions-based, Western-backed engagement was evident in their refusal to attend the UN meeting of Afghan envoys in February.

The IEA was not invited to last year’s summit, so they rejected the new meeting as “ineffective and counterproductive.” Likely emboldened by Beijing treating them as a normal regime, the IEA responded to the UN’s invitation by insisting they be treated as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

Foreign Affairs reported that with new sources of support, the IEA has less reason to submit to Western demands on human rights or inclusiveness in their government.

The failure of Washington’s existing IEA approach highlights the growing challenges to US diplomatic power around the world, Foreign Affairs stated.

Amid two major wars and intensifying strategic competition with China, the United States faces new difficulties in forging a collective international response to pressing global crises.

Meanwhile, China and regional actors are charting their own diplomatic paths, and regimes that the United States seeks to pressure can often find enough friends to defy Washington and maneuver for diplomatic gain, Foreign Affairs reported.

Latest News

World must re-engage to prevent all-out Afghanistan-Pakistan war: Financial Times

Published

on

In an opinion article published on Sunday, Financial Times warned that rising tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan risk spiraling into a wider conflict, and urged the international community to urgently re-engage with the troubled region.

The publication noted that nearly five years after the Islamic Emirate’s return to power, global attention has largely faded, despite growing instability. It highlighted restrictions on women’s rights and the worsening relationship between Kabul and Islamabad, once close allies.

According to the article, Pakistan’s ties with the IEA have sharply deteriorated since 2021. Islamabad accuses Afghan authorities of harboring militant groups responsible for attacks inside Pakistan—an allegation the IEA denies.

Recent weeks have seen a surge in violence, including cross-Durand Line airstrikes and clashes that have reportedly killed over 1,000 people and displaced more than 100,000. One of the deadliest incidents involved an airstrike on a drug rehabilitation center in Kabul, which Afghan officials say killed hundreds.

The newspaper warned that continued escalation could destabilize South and Central Asia and risk turning Afghanistan into a hub for militant activity once again.

It criticized Pakistan’s military approach, saying airstrikes alone cannot end insurgencies, and called for sustained ceasefire efforts following a temporary truce during Eid al-Fitr.

The editorial urged major powers, including the United States and China, to play a more active diplomatic role. It also pointed to China’s strategic interests in the region and suggested Beijing could step forward as a mediator.

Despite past failed attempts at peace, the Financial Times stressed that the risks are too high for the world to remain disengaged.

Continue Reading

Latest News

UN chief urges investment in water systems to advance gender equality

Published

on

Marking World Water Day, UN Secretary-General António Guterres on Sunday stressed that access to safe water and sanitation is essential for protecting the rights and health of women and girls, urging governments to take stronger action.

In his message, the Secretary-General warned that women and girls bear the greatest burden where water and sanitation services are inadequate. Many are forced to use unsafe facilities, care for relatives affected by waterborne diseases and spend hours each day collecting water—often missing out on education and opportunities.

Highlighting this year’s theme, “Where water flows, equality grows,” Guterres said improving water access can play a key role in advancing gender equality.

He called on governments to boost investment in water and sanitation systems by improving service delivery, strengthening workforce capacity and ensuring sustainable financing. He also urged developed nations to support these efforts by sharing technology, expertise and funding to build resilient infrastructure.

The UN chief emphasized the importance of including women in decision-making processes to ensure water systems effectively meet community needs.

While noting that water scarcity can contribute to conflict, Guterres said it can also foster cooperation and peace. He pointed to the upcoming UN Water Conference as an opportunity for countries to accelerate progress toward universal access to water and sanitation.

“Together, let’s make water a force for gender equality,” he said, calling for global efforts to ensure no community is left behind.

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

Water crisis deepens in Afghanistan as families struggle for access

Traditional sources such as wells and karezes—underground channels that have sustained communities for generations—are now under severe strain.

Published

on

As the world marks World Water Day, Afghanistan is facing a worsening water crisis, with millions of people struggling to access safe and reliable supplies.

Years of drought, declining rainfall, rapid population growth and the return of families from neighbouring countries have placed increasing pressure on already fragile water systems.

Traditional sources such as wells and karezes—underground channels that have sustained communities for generations—are now under severe strain.

In many rural areas, families are forced to rely on unsafe surface water or travel long distances to meet daily needs. Women and children are most affected, often spending hours each day collecting water.

Urban centres, including Kabul, Mazar-e-Sharif and Kandahar, are also grappling with shortages. Rapid population growth and unregulated groundwater extraction have led to significant depletion, leaving many households dependent on private wells or water deliveries.

The situation in Kandahar is particularly severe. Reports indicate that numerous wells have dried up, while others have dropped to depths of more than 100 metres.

Local community leader Fazil Rahman described water shortages as the most pressing challenge in his area, noting that even deep boreholes are failing to produce sufficient supply. He added that the crisis is disrupting education and livelihoods, as children are often forced to spend hours fetching water instead of attending school.

In response, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), in partnership with the Urban Water Supply and Sewage State-Owned Corporation, launched a water infrastructure project in Kandahar in 2025. The initiative aims to improve access for more than 100,000 residents through expanded pipelines, new household connections and solar-powered pumping systems.

The ICRC has also upgraded a major water pumping station in Herat, now supplying water to more than 400,000 people through tens of thousands of household connections.

Beyond urban areas, water scarcity is also affecting agriculture, the backbone of many rural livelihoods. Reduced irrigation has led to lower crop yields and increased risks of food insecurity and malnutrition.

To support affected communities, the ICRC has rehabilitated irrigation canals, karezes and flood protection systems in several provinces, including projects in Parwan Province.

Despite these efforts, humanitarian organisations warn that aid alone will not be enough. Long-term investment in infrastructure, improved water management and stronger policies will be essential to address the crisis.

Without sustained and coordinated action, experts caution that water shortages could continue to threaten public health, food security and stability across Afghanistan.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Ariana News. All rights reserved!