Latest News
Afghanistan’s isolation is not the solution, we must be patient and pragmatic: UN envoy
Isolation is not the solution, and the international community must continue to engage to build trust for the benefit of the Afghan people, UN envoy Roza Otunbayeva told the Security Council on Thursday.
“Some say that engagement has not worked because these decisions keep coming despite international condemnation,” Otunbayeva said. “But pressure and condemnation do not seem to be working, and if pursued without forward-leaning, principled engagement, it will lead to Afghanistan’s isolation. Isolation is not the solution, and we must continue to engage to build trust for the benefit of the Afghan people. We must be both patient and pragmatic, while also strong and resolute in our principles.”
She said that the Islamic Emirate has continued to pursue their vision of an Islamic system and their interpretation of Afghan culture, which continues to be characterized by unprecedented restrictions on women and on girls.
She noted that as we are now approaching nearly twelve-hundred days without girls having access to formal education beyond the sixth grade, with women and girls facing a progressive erasure from almost all walks of life.
US envoy Linda Thomas-Greenfield said that IEA’s new restrictions targeting women’s medical training denies logic and could represent a death sentence for Afghan women and girls in dire need of potentially lifesaving medical treatment.
“It will have an impact on every mother, every unborn infant – boys and girls – and on the future of Afghanistan,” she said.
The US diplomat said that Afghan experts, particularly women, must be meaningfully included throughout the Doha Process and its working groups. “We cannot allow the Taliban (IEA) to dictate the terms of these meetings or to exclude Afghan experts,” she said.
Addressing the Afghan women, she said: “We will endeavor to match your resolve by developing creative solutions and concrete initiatives that will provide opportunities for education and employment, while we use all the tools at the Council’s disposal to push the Taliban (IEA) to rescind its discriminatory decrees.”
Russian envoy Vassily Nebenzia expressed concern about the ongoing security risks emanating from the persistent terrorist activity of Daesh.
He said that the Islamic Emirate is making efforts against the group, but they can hardly be described as sufficient to definitely eradicate terrorism.
“We see that the fighters are enhancing their presence in the country and they are deliberately escalating the situation there by recruiting new fighters, including foreign terrorist fighters, and carrying out new terrorist attacks targeting representatives of religious and ethnic minorities, including women and children,” he said.
“Given the amount of weaponry left in the country by the Western military, the threat of these weapons falling into the hands of fighters and subsequently spreading throughout the region and beyond is becoming more and more likely,” he warned.
Chinese envoy Fu Cong said that the international community expects the Islamic Emirate to govern moderately, build an inclusive government, and protect the basic rights and interests of all people.
“We hope that Afghanistan will heed the reasonable concerns of the international community and protect women’s rights to education, employment, and public life,” he said. “At the same time, we should realize that the issue of women’s rights is not the entire problem of Afghanistan, nor is it the main source of the current challenges. It is necessary to support the development and reconstruction of Afghanistan, eliminate the root causes of instability, and create favorable conditions for protecting the rights and interests of all people, including women.”
Ahead of the meeting, IEA’s spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that the government should have a representative in such meetings.
“We want Afghans to have a seat before discussing Afghanistan. The representative of the current system should be there, defend the position, clear the ambiguities. Then, if the decision is made in the light of a clear light, it will be fair,” said Mujahid.
Latest News
Airstrike on Kabul drug rehabilitation centre sparks legal concerns
Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for Research, Isabelle Lassee, said the scale of casualties suggests the presence of a significant civilian population at the site.
An airstrike on a drug rehabilitation facility in Kabul has drawn sharp criticism from Amnesty International, raising serious questions about compliance with international humanitarian law.
The strike, carried out on 16 March, targeted a site at Camp Phoenix, a former military base that has functioned largely as a rehabilitation centre since 2016. Pakistani officials have claimed the attack was aimed at an ammunition depot allegedly located within the compound.
Responding to those claims, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for Research, Isabelle Lassee, said the scale of casualties suggests the presence of a significant civilian population at the site.
“While the total number of casualties has yet to be independently verified, it is clear that the attack caused extensive civilian harm, with reports indicating hundreds killed or injured,” she said.
Lassee emphasized that the facility was widely known to house civilians undergoing treatment, and warned that any military action should have taken this into account. “Pakistan’s military should have taken all feasible precautions to avoid harming civilians and civilian infrastructure,” she added.
She further noted that even if a military target had been present within the compound, international law requires that any strike be proportionate, ensuring that civilian harm is not excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
“The scale of destruction raises serious concerns about whether an adequate proportionality assessment was conducted and whether sufficient steps were taken to verify the target and minimize civilian casualties,” Lassee said.
Amnesty International has called on Pakistani authorities to disclose the intelligence behind the strike and to launch an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into the incident. The organization stressed that findings should be made public to ensure accountability.
The group also urged all parties involved in the conflict to adhere strictly to international humanitarian law and to protect civilian infrastructure, including medical and rehabilitation facilities.
The airstrike formed part of Pakistan’s “Operation Ghazab Lil Haq,” which included strikes in both Kabul and Nangarhar Province. The targeted rehabilitation centre, known as Omid, reportedly had the capacity to accommodate around 2,000 individuals.
Casualty figures remain contested. Islamic Emirate officials claim more than 400 civilians were killed and over 200 injured, though these numbers have not been independently verified. The United Nations has so far confirmed 143 deaths.
The strike comes amid escalating tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan. According to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, at least 76 civilian casualties had already been recorded since the conflict intensified in February.
Pakistani officials, meanwhile, reported civilian casualties on their side of the border, including four deaths in Bajaur district on 15 March and the killing of a child in North Waziristan earlier in the month, allegedly due to cross-border fire from Afghanistan.
The latest developments underscore growing concerns about civilian safety as hostilities between the two countries continue to intensify.
Latest News
Afghanistan expresses condolences after deadly helicopter crash in Qatar
Latest News
Pakistan seeks Russian mediation to resolve Afghanistan tensions
Pakistan’s ambassador to Russia, Faisal Niaz Tirmizi, has confirmed that Islamabad has asked Moscow to mediate in the ongoing conflict with Afghanistan.
In an interview with Russian daily Izvestia, Tirmizi said Pakistan is engaging with Russia and appreciates the “wonderful offer” to help resolve tensions. He noted that proposals from Russia, China, Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia led to an agreement on a temporary ceasefire.
“We tell all our interlocutors: please tell the Taliban (IEA) not to use this opportunity simply to regroup, recuperate, rearm, and re-attack,” Tirmizi said. “Because such large states as Russia or Pakistan cannot be destabilized by terrorist acts.”
The ambassador emphasized that decades of war in Afghanistan have affected not only Kabul and Islamabad but also neighboring countries, including Iran, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and even Russia. “Therefore, we must all trade with each other, develop education, art, and culture. Terrorism is the wrong way to go,” he added.
The appeal for mediation comes amid rising cross-Durand Line tensions and violence that have killed hundreds and displaced thousands in recent weeks.
Pakistani officials have repeatedly claimed that militant attacks in the country are organized in Afghanistan.
The IEA however denies the claim saying that Afghanistan is not responsible for Pakistan’s “security failure.”
-
Latest News5 days agoIEA announces temporary pause in defensive operations against Pakistan for Eid
-
Latest News4 days agoPakistani shelling hits Kunar districts despite ‘pause in hostility’ over Eid
-
Sport3 days agoAfghanistan national buzkashi falls short in Kokpar World Championship semifinals
-
Regional4 days agoPakistan among top nuclear threats to America, US intelligence chief tells senate
-
Latest News5 days agoUNAMA puts death toll from Pakistan’s attack on Kabul’s Omid Hospital at 143
-
Sport2 days agoIreland to host Afghanistan for ODI series in August
-
Latest News4 days agoPeshawar High Court grants bail to 68 detained Afghan nationals, including minors
-
World4 days agoUS weighs troop deployment as Iran war enters new phase
