Connect with us

Regional

India PM Modi warns Pakistan of more strikes if there is a ‘terrorist attack’

Modi’s address came hours after the military operations chiefs of India and Pakistan spoke by phone, two days after they agreed to the ceasefire.

Published

on

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan on Monday that New Delhi would target “terrorist hideouts” across the border again if there were new attacks on India and would not be deterred by what he called Islamabad’s “nuclear blackmail”, Reuters reported.

Modi’s first public comments since Indian armed forces launched strikes on what New Delhi said were “terrorist camps” across the border last week indicated a hardening of India’s position on ties with its neighbour, which were icy even before the latest fighting.

Pakistan denies Indian accusations that it supports militants who attack it and says the locations hit by India last week were civilian sites.

Modi was speaking two days after the nuclear-armed neighbours agreed to a ceasefire, announced by U.S. President Donald Trump.

The truce was reached after four days of intense exchanges of fire as the old enemies targeted each other’s military installations with missiles and drones, killing dozens of civilians.

The military confrontation began on Wednesday, when India said it launched strikes on nine “terrorist infrastructure” sites in Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir following an attack on Hindu tourists by Islamist militants in Indian Kashmir last month that killed 26 men.

Islamabad denied any links to the attack and called for a neutral investigation.

“If there is a terrorist attack on India, a fitting reply will be given… on our terms,” Modi said, speaking in Hindi in a televised address. “In the coming days, we will measure every step of Pakistan… what kind of attitude Pakistan will adopt.”

“India will strike precisely and decisively at the terrorist hideouts developing under the cover of nuclear blackmail,” he said, and listed New Delhi’s conditions for holding talks with Islamabad and lifting curbs imposed after the Kashmir attack.

“India’s position is clear: terror and talks cannot go together; terror and trade cannot go together. And water and blood cannot flow together,” he said, referring to a water sharing pact between the two countries New Delhi suspended.

There was no immediate response to his comments from Islamabad.

Hindu-majority India and Muslim Pakistan both rule part of the Himalayan region of Kashmir, but claim it in full. They have fought two of their three wars since independence in 1947 over the region and there have been several other more limited flare-ups, including in 2016 and 2019, read the report.

The latest military conflict between the South Asian neighbours spiralled alarmingly on Saturday and there were briefly fears that nuclear arsenals might come into play as Pakistan’s military said a top body overseeing its nuclear weapons would meet.

But the Pakistani defence minister said no such meeting was scheduled.

Military analysts said this may have been Pakistan’s way of hinting at its nuclear option as Islamabad has a “first-use” policy if its existence is under threat in a conflict.

Modi’s address came hours after the military operations chiefs of India and Pakistan spoke by phone, two days after they agreed to the ceasefire.

“Issues related to continuing the commitment that both sides must not fire a single shot or initiate any aggressive and inimical action against each other were discussed,” the Indian army said.

“It was also agreed that both sides consider immediate measures to ensure troop reduction from the borders and forward areas,” it added.

There was no immediate Pakistani readout of the military operations chiefs’ talks.

In Washington, Trump said the leaders of India and Pakistan were “unwavering”, and the U.S. “helped a lot” to secure the ceasefire, adding that trade was a “big reason” why the countries stopped fighting.

“We are going to do a lot of trade with Pakistan… and India. We are negotiating with India right now. We are soon going to negotiate with Pakistan,” he said, just ahead of Modi’s speech.

Pakistan has thanked the U.S. for brokering the ceasefire while India, which opposes third-party involvement in its disputes with Pakistan, has not commented on Washington’s role.

Pakistan’s international bonds rallied sharply on Monday, adding as much as 5.7 cents in the dollar, Tradeweb data showed.

Late on Friday, the International Monetary Fund approved a fresh $1.4-billion loan and also the first review of its $7-billion programme, Reuters reported.

Pakistan’s benchmark share index (.KSE), closed up 9.4% on Monday, while India’s blue-chip Nifty 50 (.NSEI), index closed 3.8% higher in its best session since February 2021.

In Beijing the foreign ministry said China, which also controls a small slice of Kashmir, was willing to maintain communication with both its neighbours, and play a “constructive role in achieving a comprehensive and lasting ceasefire” and maintaining peace.

India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989, but Pakistan says it provides only moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiri separatists.

Regional

Pakistan’s leaders dread US Democrats’ win but its households are praying for it

Pakistan’s courtship of Trump, capped by its mediation in ​the Iran war, earned it a close relationship with his administration. That access has yet to deliver clear economic gains, and congressional scrutiny of Islamabad’s dealings with Trump’s inner ​circle now threatens the rewards its leaders hoped would follow.

Published

on

Pakistan’s leaders spent two years courting US President Donald Trump, but after the Democrats’ win in Tuesday’s congressional vote, they are preparing for scrutiny ​of their access to the White House.

Ordinary Pakistanis see the result differently. Many hope the shift in Washington will ease a cost-of-living crisis intensified ‌by the US-Israel war on Iran, Reuters reported.

“We believe meaningful negotiations with the current US administration are not possible, and the ongoing bloodshed will not end until there is a change in [the US] ​government,” Karachi resident Sajjad Ali said.

“We want peace, economic improvement and a reduction in the rising oil prices.”

Asim Zafar, also from Karachi, said he hoped ​the results would rein in Trump. “It could bring changes in important policies and perhaps help prevent some of the injustices being committed ⁠against Muslim countries,” he said.

But for Pakistan’s government and powerful military leadership, analysts say, the outcome is far more worrying.

Pakistan’s courtship of Trump, capped by its mediation in ​the Iran war, earned it a close relationship with his administration. That access has yet to deliver clear economic gains, and congressional scrutiny of Islamabad’s dealings with Trump’s inner ​circle now threatens the rewards its leaders hoped would follow.

A BET ON ONE MAN

The courtship began early in Trump’s second term, with army chief Asim Munir — who Trump has repeatedly described as his “favourite field marshal” — as Islamabad’s main channel to the White House.

Their June 2025 lunch took place unusually without Pakistani civilian officials present, which put the military at the centre of the rapprochement.

According to Pakistan’s military, ​their talks went beyond security to cooperation in mining, energy and cryptocurrency.

Pakistan then joined Trump’s Board of Peace and nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize, crediting him with ​helping end its May 2025 conflict with India. New Delhi denies US mediation halted hostilities.

Earlier this year, Iran mediation gave the courtship strategic substance: Islamabad relayed messages and hosted April talks between the ‌US and ⁠Iran, but the eventual Islamabad Agreement quickly faltered.

For consumers, Pakistan’s rising diplomatic influence has offered little protection from the war’s costs while the payoff for the state has also been thin. The US Export-Import Bank approved $1.25 billion for Pakistan’s Reko Diq copper and gold project in December 2025. But Pakistan’s signature $10 billion request for a US Treasury facility remains unanswered.

DEALS UNDER SCRUTINY

Pakistan’s outreach, public and private, now carries political risk because several arrangements involve Trump’s family or close associates.

Islamabad has signed memoranda to explore payments in USD1, a stablecoin issued ​by the Trump-linked World Liberty Financial. At ​the signing in January, Finance Minister ⁠Muhammad Aurangzeb said innovation should be “aligned with regulation, stability, and national interest.”

It has also signed another memorandum to redevelop Manhattan’s Roosevelt Hotel, a deal negotiated by envoy Steve Witkoff, and placed a limited drone order with Powerus, whose investors include Trump’s sons Donald Jr. and ​Eric.

“There are no conflicts of interest,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told Reuters in September, when asked about Powerus.

Husain Haqqani, ​a former Pakistani ambassador ⁠to Washington and senior fellow at the Abu Dhabi-based Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy, said Pakistan’s leaders had “built a transactional relationship” with Trump’s team. Some arrangements involving the president’s friends and relatives “might not last,” he said. “Pakistan seems totally unprepared for that scrutiny.”

Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Stimson Center, warned that investigations could taint the wider relationship if dealings appeared ⁠driven by ​private interests.

From Pakistan’s perspective, there may still be cards left to play, analysts said.

The Atlantic Council’s Michael ​Kugelman said Pakistan’s counterterrorism cooperation and Iran diplomacy enjoyed bipartisan support, and Democrats would be more likely to blame problematic deals on Trump than on Pakistan.

But “the risk for Pakistan is that it put so many of ​its diplomatic eggs in the White House basket that it won’t have anything left for the Democrats,” Kugelman said.

Continue Reading

Regional

Iran sent nuclear proposal to the US via Qatar, senior Iranian official tells Reuters

Published

on

Iran has sent the United States a nuclear proposal via Qatar, to ​be discussed only after Washington meets Tehran’s seven demands, ‌a senior Iranian official told Reuters on Thursday.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the US was reviewing the proposal but ​declined to provide further details.

Mediators have intensified efforts to ​end the war between Iran and the United States ⁠amid fears it could reignite after the US midterm ​elections, with Trump on Tuesday declining to rule out a resumption ​of combat operations after the vote and Iran planning wider retaliation if war resumes.

Iran’s top security official Mohsen Rezaei had said earlier on ​Thursday, during a visit to Russia: “On the issue of diplomacy, ​we have announced seven conditions to the Americans. As long as they ‌do ⁠not execute our seven conditions, we will neither open the Strait of Hormuz nor have negotiations”.

Iran has demanded the lifting of US sanctions, the release of frozen Iranian assets and war ​reparations, among other ​conditions, while Washington ⁠has said nuclear issues must be part of any initial negotiations.

The US and Israel attacked ​Iran on February 28, and Iran responded with ​strikes ⁠on Israel and Gulf states that host US bases. Conflict also erupted in Lebanon between Iran-backed Hezbollah and Israel, and more ⁠recently ​spread to Yemen, from where the ​Iran-aligned Houthis have struck energy facilities, airports and other targets in Saudi Arabia.

Continue Reading

Regional

Iran says US voted ‘No to War’ after Republican midterm losses

The comments came after US President Donald Trump acknowledged that the war with Iran and rising petrol prices had contributed to the Republicans’ poor election performance.

Published

on

Iran’s chief negotiator and parliament speaker, Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf, has said American voters sent a clear message against war following major Republican losses in the US midterm elections, declaring that Tehran endorses their position.
 
“We endorse this message,” Ghalibaf wrote on X, referring to the election results.
 
He warned that if Washington ignored public opposition to the conflict in favour of outside interests, it would face serious consequences.
 
The comments came after US President Donald Trump acknowledged that the war with Iran and rising petrol prices had contributed to the Republicans’ poor election performance.
 
Speaking to Fox News, Trump said Iran had played a part in the results, adding that while many Americans supported his approach, they were less willing to bear the immediate financial consequences of higher fuel prices.
 
In a separate interview with CBS News, Trump said the conflict would end “when I say it ends”.
 
Trump has also warned that the United States and Israel could resume large-scale military operations against Iran if negotiations fail to produce an agreement.
 
Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not appeared in public since reportedly being seriously wounded in an Israeli air strike that killed his predecessor and father, Ali Khamenei, warned that any renewed conflict would have much wider consequences.
 
He also dismissed expectations of a change in US policy towards Iran, describing such hopes as a serious miscalculation.
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Ariana News. All rights reserved!