Latest News
UN Security Council to meet Monday over US action in Venezuela
The U.S. military action overnight constitutes “a dangerous precedent,” Guterres’ spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said in a statement.
The United Nations Security Council is due to meet on Monday after the U.S. attacked Venezuela and deposed its long-serving autocratic President Nicolas Maduro, a move that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres views as setting “a dangerous precedent.”
Colombia, backed by Russia and China, requested the meeting of the 15-member council, diplomats said. The U.N. Security Council has met twice – in October and December – over the escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday that Washington would run Venezuela “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.” It is unclear how Trump plans to oversee Venezuela.
“This is a colonial war aimed at destroying our republican form of government, freely chosen by our people, and at imposing a puppet government that allows the plundering of our natural resources, including the world’s largest oil reserves,” Venezuela’s U.N. Ambassador Samuel Moncada wrote to the U.N. Security Council on Saturday.
He said the U.S. had violated the founding U.N. Charter, which states: ” All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.”
The U.S. military action overnight constitutes “a dangerous precedent,” Guterres’ spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said in a statement.
“The Secretary-General continues to emphasize the importance of full respect – by all – of international law, including the UN Charter. He’s deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not been respected,” Dujarric said.
The Trump administration has for months targeted suspected drug trafficking boats off the Venezuelan coast and the Pacific coast of Latin America. The U.S. ramped up its military presence in the region and announced a blockade of all vessels subject to U.S. sanctions, last month intercepting two tankers loaded with Venezuelan crude.
In October, the U.S. justified its action as consistent with Article 51 of the founding U.N. Charter, which requires the Security Council to be immediately informed of any action states take in self-defense against armed attack.
“This is not regime change this is justice,” U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz posted on X on Saturday. “Maduro was an indicted, illegitimate dictator that led a declared Narco-terrorism organization responsible for killing American citizens.”
Latest News
Pakistan has supported terror camps openly for decades, says Indian FM
India’s relationship with Pakistan remains a unique challenge in global diplomacy due to Islamabad’s longstanding backing of terrorism, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said on Tuesday. He noted that New Delhi must shape its policies around this “unpalatable reality.”
“There are some exceptions. For us, the relationship with Pakistan is an exception,” Jaishankar said, explaining that Pakistan’s conduct towards India has few parallels in the modern international system.
Challenging critics to find a comparable example, he added: “Show me in the world in this day and age any country which actually has actually pursued the kind of policies that Pakistan has against its neighbour.” Jaishankar said Pakistan’s use of terrorism as an instrument of state policy was neither covert nor episodic, but sustained and visible over decades.
“For decades, you had these training camps, not secret training camps; they’re all training camps in the big cities of Pakistan, very open, where the state, the military supports terrorism,” he said.
Pakistan has sought to legitimise such actions internationally, despite growing global scepticism, EAM Jaishankar added. “And they try to normalise it as though it’s their right to do it,” he said, adding that such narratives no longer find acceptance. “Nobody buys it anymore. Everybody knows that these are people who are supporting the state.”
Describing this as a harsh but unavoidable truth, Jaishankar said India cannot afford to ignore the implications of Pakistan’s actions. “It’s a very unpalatable reality but it’s one which we cannot be oblivious to,” he said.
He stressed that India’s foreign and security policies must be grounded in this assessment. “We have to build our policies, saying okay, that’s how that particular neighbour is going to be,” Jaishankar said.
On New Delhi’s broader approach, he drew a clear distinction between countries that cooperate constructively with India and those that undermine its security. “Those who are willing to work with us and be helpful, positive, we’ll have to deal with them in that way,” he said. “Those who do the kind of things which Pakistan does, we’ll have to deal with it in a different way.”
Citing India’s response in the times of disasters like cyclone in Sri Lanka, earthquake in Myanmar and Afghanistan, Jaishankar said, “When big problem happen to countries and they do not have the capacity to cope with it, they naturally turn to those who do. And in our region, there is a growing belief that the country which can be relied upon in this regard is India.”
Latest News
Iran to intensify talks with Afghanistan over water rights
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has instructed senior political officials to step up efforts to secure Iran’s water rights from Afghanistan, amid growing concerns over reduced water flows.
According to Iran’s state news agency IRNA, Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi said at an event in Tehran that Iran and Turkmenistan are entitled to water from the Harirod River, but Afghanistan, as an upstream country, has constructed the Salma Dam, making negotiations necessary to ensure Iran’s share from the dam.
“Yesterday, the president directed the country’s political authorities to be more active on this issue,” Aliabadi said.
He noted that despite numerous rounds of talks with Afghanistan, Iran failed to receive its full water entitlement last year. However, he expressed optimism that improved rainfall this year could help address the shortfall.
Aliabadi said discussions with Afghan officials are ongoing, adding that he has invited Afghan representatives to visit Iran twice and has is ready to extend a third invitation. He also said Iran is prepared to send a delegation to Afghanistan to pursue the matter closely.
Iranian officials have repeatedly voiced concerns over water rights shared with Afghanistan, particularly amid prolonged drought and declining river flows.
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) has maintained that it remains committed to the water treaty governing the Helmand River, but says severe drought has significantly reduced water volumes.
Latest News
Khalilzad suggests Afghanistan–Pakistan security deal, says IEA ready to negotiate
Former U.S. special representative for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad on Wednesday proposed a potential security agreement between Afghanistan and Pakistan, saying such a deal could be game-changing for relations between the two neighboring countries.
In a post on X, Khalilzad said Pakistan’s military spokesperson Sharif Chaudhry had referred to the Doha Agreement between the United States and the IEA, noting that it was a misunderstanding to suggest the accord addressed Afghanistan–Pakistan issues. Khalilzad emphasized that the Doha Agreement did not cover bilateral relations between Kabul and Islamabad.
However, he said the reference sparked an important idea: a separate agreement between Afghanistan and Pakistan focused on mutual security concerns. According to Khalilzad, such an agreement would commit both sides to preventing any individual or group — including Daesh and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) — from using their territories to threaten the security of the other country. He added that third-party monitoring could help ensure compliance.
Khalilzad said that based on his recent discussions with IEA leaders, he believes they are willing to negotiate such an agreement. He described the proposal as potentially “game-changing” for relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan, which have long been strained by security disputes and militant activity.
“The ball is in Pakistan’s court,” Khalilzad said, suggesting that progress now depends on Islamabad’s willingness to engage.
Relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have faced repeated tensions in recent years, particularly over militant attacks and accusations that militant groups operate from each other’s territory.
-
Sport5 days agoAbu Dhabi Knight Riders beat Dubai Capitals to reach ILT20 Qualifier 2
-
Sport3 days agoAfghanistan set to face West Indies in crucial T20I series
-
Sport4 days agoPakistan Under‑19s defeat Afghanistan U19 by 133 runs in Zimbabwe tri‑series
-
Latest News5 days agoAfghanistan’s rail transport grows over 18 percent this year: MoPW
-
Latest News5 days agoPakistan says it respects Afghanistan’s sovereignty, rules out ‘regime change’
-
Latest News4 days agoTurkish police arrest 32 Afghan migrants hidden in waste tanker
-
Regional4 days agoPakistan court sentences journalists to life over links to protests after Imran Khan’s arrest
-
Latest News3 days agoTrump criticizes abandonment of military equipment in Afghanistan after Venezuela attack
