Latest News
IEA says it will review new UN Resolution based on Islamic and national principles
The United States objected to the resolution, citing concerns that it could indirectly legitimize the IEA government.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has announced that it will assess the contents of the recent United Nations Resolution on Afghanistan in accordance with Islamic teachings and national interests.
In an official statement, the ministry expressed appreciation for certain positive aspects of the resolution discussed during the UN General Assembly, including the emphasis by some member states on security in Afghanistan, the Islamic Emirate’s efforts in counter-narcotics, support for recent achievements, and the removal of obstacles to economic growth.
However, the statement also rejected parts of the resolution, arguing that the document fails to reflect the on-the-ground humanitarian realities in Afghanistan and did not incorporate the Islamic Emirate’s position during its drafting and adoption.
The Ministry reaffirmed that, despite its reservations, the Islamic Emirate will review the resolution’s demands and recommendations thoroughly and responsibly, based on Islamic principles and in alignment with the country’s national interests.
This response comes in the wake of the UN’s adoption of a new resolution addressing humanitarian, security, and human rights concerns in Afghanistan—an action that has sparked diverse reactions domestically and internationally.
UN Resolution
The United Nations General Assembly on Monday adopted the new resolution urging the IEA to reverse their policies against women and girls and called for stronger international engagement with Afghanistan, despite opposition from the United States and Israel.
Passed with 116 votes in favor, the non-binding resolution highlights deep global concern over the human rights situation in Afghanistan, particularly the IEA’s restrictions on female education and employment.
Twelve countries — including Russia, China, India, and Iran — abstained from the vote, while the U.S. and Israel voted against it.
The resolution calls on the IEA to lift bans that prevent girls from attending school beyond sixth grade and bar women from most public roles. It also demands the dismantling of terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS operating in the country.
In addition, the resolution emphasizes the importance of economic recovery and continued humanitarian support; commends countries like Iran and Pakistan for hosting Afghan refugees and encourages the international community to assist; and requests the UN Secretary-General to appoint a special coordinator to enhance the coherence of global engagement with Afghanistan.
Although symbolic, the resolution marks a significant step in maintaining pressure on the IEA and reaffirms the international community’s support for the Afghan people.
The United States objected to the resolution, citing concerns that it could indirectly legitimize the IEA government.
Latest News
Peshawar High Court halts deportation of Afghan medical students
The students’ lawyer argued that the PMDC decisions were issued without prior notice and conflicted with the NOCs previously granted by the HEC.
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has temporarily halted the deportation of 14 Afghan medical and dental students enrolled at colleges across Pakistan’s Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad and Justice Farah Jamshed issued notices to the relevant authorities and directed them to submit written responses within 14 days. The court adjourned the case until October 12.
The students told the court that they had been admitted to medical and dental colleges under the Afghan quota through the prescribed legal process. They said Pakistan’s Higher Education Commission (HEC) had also issued them no-objection certificates (NOCs) to facilitate their visa applications.
The case follows decisions by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) on July 31 and September 1 to cancel the admissions of Afghan students and direct them to return to Afghanistan as part of Pakistan’s ongoing repatriation policy.
The students’ lawyer argued that the PMDC decisions were issued without prior notice and conflicted with the NOCs previously granted by the HEC.
He also referred to a similar ruling by the Lahore High Court, which suspended PMDC orders affecting Afghan medical students.
Pending further proceedings, the Peshawar High Court has directed that the 14 students be allowed to continue their education while their case is under consideration.
Latest News
Khalilzad condemns Pakistan airstrikes, says current strategy is not working
Khalilzad called for a change in Pakistan’s strategy toward what he described as key internal crises as well as Afghanistan.
Former U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad has criticized Pakistan’s approach to Afghanistan following reported Pakistani airstrikes in the eastern Afghan provinces of Kunar and Paktika, saying Islamabad needs to change its strategy.
In a statement posted on X on Monday afternoon, Khalilzad said the latest attacks had again resulted in civilian deaths and argued that Pakistan’s current approach was failing to address its internal challenges or its relationship with Afghanistan.
“Once again Pakistan has attacked Afghanistan killing civilians,” Khalilzad wrote, adding that the strikes came as what he described as Pakistan’s internal crises intensified.
“More of the same is not the solution,” he said, using the analogy that when someone is in a hole, “the smart thing to do is to stop digging.”
Khalilzad called for a change in Pakistan’s strategy toward what he described as key internal crises as well as Afghanistan. He also said he remained doubtful that Pakistan’s current leadership would change course.
“The current approach means more bad news for Pakistan and Afghanistan,” he said.
His comments came after Pakistani airstrikes were reported in Kunar and Paktika early Monday. UNAMA said at least three civilians — a man, a woman and a girl — were killed and four others injured in apparent airstrikes in Kunar.
Pakistan said its military had carried out “calibrated” strikes against militant targets in the border region with Afghanistan, claiming that 28 militants were killed. Islamabad said the targets included hideouts and a training centre belonging to militant groups, Dawn News reported.
Afghan authorities condemned the strikes, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoning Pakistan’s chargé d’affaires in Kabul and handing him a formal protest. Afghan officials have rejected Pakistan’s allegations that militant attacks inside Pakistan originate from Afghan territory.
The latest strikes have renewed tensions between the two neighbours after nearly three months of relative calm. The dispute has centred on Pakistan’s allegations that armed groups, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), operate from Afghan territory — allegations the Afghan authorities deny.
Khalilzad, who served as the U.S. special representative for Afghanistan reconciliation from 2018 to 2021, has previously commented on tensions between Kabul and Islamabad. His latest statement adds to growing calls for a diplomatic approach as cross-frontier violence continues to affect civilians in Afghanistan’s eastern provinces.
Latest News
Afghanistan summons Pakistani diplomat over airstrikes in Kunar and Paktika
According to the ministry, a formal letter of protest was handed to the Pakistani diplomat, strongly condemning what it described as violations of Afghan territory.
Afghanistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has summoned Pakistan’s chargé d’affaires in Kabul and lodged a formal protest over reported Pakistani airstrikes in the eastern provinces of Kunar and Paktika.
The ministry said the strikes, which were carried out in the early hours of Monday morning, violated Afghanistan’s airspace, sovereignty and territorial integrity, and accused Pakistan of targeting civilian areas and facilities.
According to the ministry, a formal letter of protest was handed to the Pakistani diplomat, strongly condemning what it described as violations of Afghan territory.
The Afghan Foreign Ministry also rejected claims that recent security incidents in Pakistan originated from Afghan territory, describing such allegations as baseless.
The ministry said such claims should not be used to justify military action against Afghanistan, and urged Pakistan to address its security and political challenges by focusing on their underlying causes rather than blaming other countries.
The latest developments follow reports of Pakistani airstrikes in Afghanistan’s eastern provinces amid heightened tensions between the two neighbouring countries.
Afghan authorities have called for respect for Afghanistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and warned against further military action on Afghan soil.
-
Latest News5 days agoFive years out of school: Amnesty raises alarm over Afghan girls’ education
-
Latest News4 days agoAfghanistan seeks stronger ties with Saudi Arabia, dialogue with Pakistan: Mujahid
-
Latest News5 days agoUS sentences Afghan man to 20 year in case linked to 2021 Kabul airport bombing
-
Latest News4 days agoAfghan man in Germany kills wife and goes to police station
-
Regional4 days agoChina presses Iran to help rein in Houthis after Saudi appeal
-
World3 days agoUS and Denmark reach deal on Greenland, Trump says
-
Latest News3 days agoAfghan official meets Iranian oil minister to discuss energy cooperation
-
Latest News5 days agoAfghanistan condemns alleged drone attack on Mecca
